Table of Contents
Why is ethical approval important in a literature review?
Ethical review provides protection for participants, and also helps to protect the researcher. By obtaining ethical approval the researcher is demonstrating that they have adhered to the accepted ethical standards of a genuine research study. The need to obtain research ethical approval is common to all research involving human participants. This approval must be obtained before research participants can be approached and before data collection can begin. All studies which will involve people as participants need a research ethics committee (REC) review. The principal investigator (or lead researcher on the study) is responsible for seeking this review. RECs are there to protect the rights, safety, dignity and wellbeing of research participants. Research involving information freely available in the public domain. For example, published biographies, newspaper accounts of an individual’s activities and published minutes of a meeting, whilst still personal data under the Data Protection Act would not require ethics review. Various types of research misconduct include fabrication or falsification of data, plagiarism, problematic data presentation or analysis, failure to obtain ethical approval by a research ethics committee or to obtain the subject’s informed consent, inappropriate claims of authorship, duplicated publication, and …
What are ethical considerations in literature review?
The key ethical issues discussed in the literature are informed consent, protection of children, anonymity and confidentiality, and payment of research participants. Some studies that do not require ethical approval include those involving information freely available in the public domain (e.g. published biographies, newspaper accounts), and the analysis of datasets, either open source or obtained from other researchers, where the data are properly anonymised and informed consent … Researchers must confirm they have obtained ethical approval from an appropriate ethics review board to conduct the study, as well as permission from the dataset owner to use the information in databases/repositories for the purposes of the research they are conducting. Three basic principles, among those generally accepted in our cultural tradition, are particularly relevant to the ethics of research involving human subjects: the principles of respect of persons, beneficence and justice. If you are planning to conduct a human research project, you have to seek ethics approval. Almost any research activity that involves human participation (including completion of questionnaires, interviews and focus groups, access to human tissue which is not on the public record etc.) is considered human research.
Why is there a need for us to be ethical in literature review?
Firstly, they help to promote the general aims of research, such as the search for knowledge and the intention to avoid error. Secondly, ethics promote values that are central to successful collaboration, including respect, trust and accountability. Obtaining ethical approval is above all, the responsibility of the author or researcher. Research misconduct is a serious ethical issue because it can undermine scientific integrity and institutional credibility. It leads to a waste of funding and resources that could have been used for alternative research. As an independent researcher, you may find it difficult to know whom to approach for ethics approval. You could contact nearby universities or institutions that have an ethics review board and inquire if they are willing to oversee ethical aspects of your study.
What are ethical considerations for a literature review?
The key ethical issues discussed in the literature are informed consent, protection of children, anonymity and confidentiality, and payment of research participants. Ethical approval is required for projects where secondary data includes personal data – data that relates to identifiable living persons. Such research fails to accurately enhance human knowledge in a societally acceptable manner, and thereby erodes public trust in science. Because of this, many measures seek to discourage unethical research, although their effectiveness remains controversial. Being ethical in business is difficult, given the nature of the tasks involved with leading an organization: The decisions are complex; there is no time for reflection, vital information is missing, etc.
What are ethical issues in literature review?
The key ethical issues discussed in the literature are informed consent, protection of children, anonymity and confidentiality, and payment of research participants. Results: The major ethical issues in conducting research are: a) Informed consent, b) Beneficence- Do not harm c) Respect for anonymity and confidentiality d) Respect for privacy. Practising ethical guidelines while conducting and reporting research is essential to establish the validity of your research. You must follow ethical guidelines issued by regulatory committees in order to ensure the safety of the participants of a study, the public at large, and that of the researcher himself/herself. Data validity and quality is mentioned as the main argument to waive consent for some types of research, such as research with self-reported outcomes or research in which the intervention consists of giving information in such a way that informing people about the study arms would interfere with the outcome. Not all laws may be ethical and not all ethical decisions are legal! Healthcare professionals may sometimes face a dilemma in balancing the two domains of ethics and law. Ethics is the aspect of philosophy that addresses questions about human conduct.
Why do systematic reviews not need ethical approval?
Unlike primary researchers, systematic reviewers do not collect deeply personal, sensitive or confidential information from participants. Systematic reviewers use publicly accessible documents as evidence and are seldom required to seek an institutional ethics approval before commencing a systematic review. Following are examples of types of research exempt from ethics review: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published and non-identifiable data. Studies that involve data available in the public domain. Experimental or laboratory studies that do not involve data collected from or about humans or animals. Do I need ethics approval? Yes. All research involving human participants or identifiable personal information has some ethical implications. Even if the research is low risk, issues such as data protection, confidentiality and anonymity need to be considered. Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. These principles include voluntary participation, informed consent, anonymity, confidentiality, potential for harm, and results communication.
What is ethics review in research?
Ethics review is the process of assessing the ethics of research involving humans. The Ethics Review Committee (ERC) is the key oversight mechanism designated to ensure ethics review. IRBs can also be called independent ethics committees (IECs). An IRB/IEC reviews the appropriateness of the clinical trial protocol as well as the risks and benefits to study participants. Ethical review is about helping you as a researcher to think through the ethical issues surrounding your research. The principles of good research practice encourage you to consider the wider consequences of your research and engage with the interests of your participants. Obtain ethics approval from an international organization (such as WHO). Approval might not have considered local context. Obtain approval from an established special review board. It takes time to organize the committee and must be organized by a trusted organization.