Table of Contents
What does the research say about psychodynamic therapy?
Understanding emotions: Research has found that psychodynamic therapy is useful for exploring and understanding emotions. Through gaining insight into emotional experiences, people are better able to recognize patterns that have contributed to dysfunction and then make changes more readily. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy is supported by empirical evidence. Patients have reported residual therapeutic gains following treatment. Some psychodynamic concepts have held up well to empirical scrutiny while others have not, and aspects of the theory remain controversial, but the psychodynamic perspective continues to influence many different areas of contemporary psychology. The greatest criticism of the psychodynamic approach is that it is unscientific in its analysis of human behavior. Many of the concepts central to Freud’s theories are subjective, and as such, difficult to test scientifically. CBT was superior to psychodynamic therapy, although not interpersonal or supportive therapies, at post-treatment and at follow-up. Studies consistently show that behavioral and emotional interventions work just as well or even better than medication to treat various mental health conditions, including anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)[3].
What is a criticism against psychodynamic therapy?
Psychodynamic theory has been criticized as being too deterministic or victim-blaming to be used in modern psychology and social work open_in_new. The original theories believed people had no control over their own behavior. There was a lack of personal agency. Firstly, the Psychodynamic theory does not follow the scientific method and so can be argued to be a pseudoscience. This theory fails to use objective methods and rather subjectively interprets ideas, such as human behaviour as being due to the unconscious. Freud’s psychoanalytic theory has been highly criticized for its dependency on case studies, lack of empirical evidence, and its lack of a strictly scientific approach. Psychoanalysis claimed to be a science but did not function like one. It failed to operationalize its hypotheses, to test them with empirical methods, or to remove constructs that failed to gain scientific support. In this way, the intellectual world of psychoanalysis more closely resembles the humanities. Freud’s most commonly debunked work has to be his theory of psychosexual development. In this framework, Freud postulated that all thoughts and emotions were rooted in innate sexual impulses. He stated that development took place in several stages: oral, anal, phallic, and latent stages.
Why is psychodynamic therapy controversial?
Use of psychodynamic therapies in health care settings is considered controversial (Leichsenring 2004; Leichsenring 2007), in part due to its sparse evidence-base in the treatment of common mental disorders in general, and specifically in depressive disorders, and also because systematic reviews of psychodynamic … Summary. Psychodynamic psychotherapy has been criticised as being based on outdated principles of psychoanalysis and lacking an adequate evidence base to convincingly demonstrate its efficacy. American Journal of Psychiatry 62: 1–9. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response. Results: For both CBT and psychodynamic therapy, response rates were approximately 70% by the 2-year follow-up. Remission rates were nearly 40% for both treatment conditions. Individuals fear judgment, change, the unknown, and what they might discover in therapy; additionally, they’re too prideful to admit they need help. Additionally, some people doubt the efficacy of mental health treatment: They’re uncertain it will work or misunderstand how it works. Psychoanalysis requires a patient who wants to learn about unconscious thoughts and their past while CBT focuses more on current problematic thoughts and behaviors. A benefit of both methods is that medication is not used. Since cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the strongest evidence-based therapies out there, it is important to include a book that discusses CBT specifically.
Can psychodynamic therapy be harmful?
In fact, therapy can be harmful, with research showing that, on average, approximately 10 per cent of clients actually get worse after starting therapy. Yet belief in the innocuousness of psychotherapy remains persistent and prevalent. A growing body of evidence suggests that psychoanalytic psychotherapy is effective for many common mental disorders, including depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and substance-related disorders. People living with certain mental health conditions who feel generally dissatisfied with their lives or seem to repeat patterns that aren’t making them happy are often good candidates for psychodynamic therapy, a type of talk therapy based on the theories of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud. Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of psychoanalysis and related approaches is the lack of empirical support for their effectiveness. The limited research that has been conducted on these treatments suggests that they do not reliably lead to better mental health outcomes (e.g., Driessen et al., 2010). Aversion therapy is controversial Because aversion therapy involves the use of unpleasant stimuli, it’s quite controversial. Numerous research studies suggest that CBT leads to significant improvement in functioning and quality of life. In many studies, CBT has been demonstrated to be as effective as, or more effective than, other forms of psychological therapy or psychiatric medications.
Is psychodynamic therapy ethical?
Ethical Problems with Psychodynamic Therapies In Psychoanalysis, the therapist takes an expert role. Because the client has no insight into their own unconscious, they rely on the therapist wholly for feedback about their progress. This can create an imbalance of power between therapist and client. In fact, therapy can be harmful, with research showing that, on average, approximately 10 per cent of clients actually get worse after starting therapy. Yet belief in the innocuousness of psychotherapy remains persistent and prevalent. While it remains influential in psychiatry, psychoanalysis can be considered a pseudoscience. Its main problem is that it fails the test of falsifiability. That is, it makes so broad statements that there’s almost nothing that wouldn’t fit within the theory, so there’s no observable evidence that could disprove it. But ultimately, the problem with psychoanalysis is that the focus is still primarily on the individual being the problem. And in the case of children, to keep focusing on them as the problem, while ignoring wider, social problems is dangerous.
Is psychodynamic therapy as effective as CBT?
For psychodynamic therapy, the effect sizes indicate long-term rather than short-term change in personality disorders. Conclusions: There is evidence that both psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy are effective treatments of personality disorders. Use of psychodynamic therapies in health care settings is considered controversial (Leichsenring 2004; Leichsenring 2007), in part due to its sparse evidence-base in the treatment of common mental disorders in general, and specifically in depressive disorders, and also because systematic reviews of psychodynamic … Even short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy requires commitment of between six and 12 months or 25-40 sessions. Longer-term therapy usually lasts between 12 and 24 months or 40-80 sessions. Sessions last 50 minutes and can be conducted either in person, online or via telephone. Emerging evidence from the recent studies shows that psychotherapy leads to definitive and demonstrable changes in the brain. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies on the cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) effects in OCD were consistent in showing decreased metabolism in the right caudate nucleus. The greatest criticism of the psychodynamic approach is that it is unscientific in its analysis of human behavior. Many of the concepts central to Freud’s theories are subjective, and as such, difficult to test scientifically.