What dilemmas could arise between the duty of care and an individuals rights?

What dilemmas could arise between the duty of care and an individuals rights?

Often, the obligation to protect an individual’s well-being can conflict with an individual’s right to make their own choices. While you are concerned that a person you care for should disagree with their decisions, you should respect that they have the right to make them as you may be the first to have objections. Conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights because sometimes they are not aware that their behavior will cause danger or harm to themselves or others. Rights particularly relevant to dignity in care include the right to life, the right not to be exposed to inhuman or degrading treatment and the right to a family life. A balance has to be reached between rights and responsibilities. This practice ensures an individual has full control, responsibility and voice over decisions affecting them, utilising good practice in the form of individual-centred approaches. Duty to Care is actually an umbrella term that encompasses the following areas: Inclusion, Diversity, Mental Health, Well-being and Safeguarding. An ethical dilemma​ describes a conflict between two morally correct courses of action. There is a conflict between values or principles. The dilemma is that you would be doing something right and wrong at the same time, and by taking one right course you will negate the other right course.

Why conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights?

Conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights because sometimes they are not aware that their behavior will cause danger or harm to themselves or others. For example, the right to express views publicly may need to be balanced with another person’s right to a private life. The rights of someone accused of a crime to question witnesses may need to be balanced against the rights of the victim and vulnerable witnesses, such as children. Ethical Dilemma: An ethical dilemma in nursing occurs when nurses find themselves with more patients than they can safely provide care to, putting patients and staff at risk. Gather resources and assistance. Have a plan. Take action based on ethical standards. How does risk assessment help address dilemmas between rights and health and safety concerns? Conducting a risk assessment minimises the health and safety concerns in the workplace while ensuring that employees can execute their right to free choice in an informed and safe way.

What ethical dilemmas may arise in own area of responsibility when balancing individual rights and duty of care?

Ethical dilemmas that may arise in my own area of responsibility when balancing individual rights and duty of care might include: confidentiality and disclosure, when the need to disclose confidential information and share with someone else arises. Abstract. By definition, an ethical dilemma involves the need to choose from among two or more morally acceptable options or between equally unacceptable courses of action, when one choice prevents selection of the other. In LDRS 111 you were introduced to four different ethical dilemma paradigms: truth vs loyalty, short-term vs long-term, individual vs community, and justice vs mercy. A closely related definition characterizes ethical dilemmas as situations in which every available choice is wrong. The term is also used in a wider sense in everyday language to refer to ethical conflicts that may be resolvable, to psychologically difficult choices or to other types of difficult ethical problems. Ensure that the individual is informed about their choices and explain what would happen if they make that choice. Look at ways the risk can be reduced, such as by completing a risk assessment, and support them in making the decision and promoting their independence.

How do you balance individual rights with a duty of care?

Ensure that the individual is informed about their choices and explain what would happen if they make that choice. Look at ways the risk can be reduced, such as by completing a risk assessment, and support them in making the decision and promoting their independence. It involves professionals working with the person to enable them to come to an agreement about how they are supported in activities and aspects of their care. It is not about being negligent or ignoring a risk which cannot be managed safely. If we do not take risks we can be hindered and stifled in our development. This practice ensures an individual has full control, responsibility and voice over decisions affecting them, utilising good practice in the form of individual-centred approaches. Ensure that the individual is informed about their choices and explain what would happen if they make that choice. Look at ways the risk can be reduced, such as by completing a risk assessment, and support them in making the decision and promoting their independence.

How do you balance individual rights and duty of care?

Ensure that the individual is informed about their choices and explain what would happen if they make that choice. Look at ways the risk can be reduced, such as by completing a risk assessment, and support them in making the decision and promoting their independence. We have to get the balance between people’s rights, risks and responsibilities correct, but maintain focus on care and support. To achieve this we need to get leaders acting together to do ‘the right things’. Spend time engaging with communities to build trust and develop the concept of risk intelligence. The law provides three general groups of scenarios where an individual has a duty to act – where the defendant has control of a situation, where the defendant has assumed responsibility, and where the defendant has created or adopted a risk. Some examples of situations where your employer’s expectations may conflict with your duty of care include excessive or unsafe workload, taking on tasks for which you are not trained or competent and being expected to work in an unsafe environment.

What are conflicts of duty of care?

Some examples of situations where your employer’s expectations may conflict with your duty of care include excessive or unsafe workload, taking on tasks for which you are not trained or competent and being expected to work in an unsafe environment. Within my line of work, there are many times that there are conflicts or dilemmas between exercising my duty of care and the rights of an individual. A typical example may be when an obese client wants to eat junk food or takeaways every day despite it being detrimental to their health. Balancing care and control can also be understood as balancing risk and need. Balancing risk and need is a dynamic process, as needs and risks and society’s ideas about them change over time. For this reason, care has to be taken to avoid assumptions and to seek supervision and support for day-to-day practice.

What are the consequences of duty of care?

The consequences of breaching duty of care obligations are typically financial and reputational which can place an organisation or an individual under severe pressure. Financial settlements can be made under a personal agreement, but are more likely to be decided in courts of law. A duty of care existed between the negligent person and the claimant; The negligent person breached their duty of care responsibilities; Injury or damage was suffered due to a negligent act or failure to exercise duty of care; A compensation claim for damages is established. The duty of care refers to the obligations placed on people to act towards others in a certain way, in accordance with certain standards. The term can have a different meaning depending on the legal context in which it is being used. Duty of care is the legal or moral responsibility to protect the safety and wellbeing of others, which includes taking all reasonable steps not to cause foreseeable harm to another person or their property. Duty of care is the legal or moral responsibility to protect the safety and wellbeing of others, which includes taking all reasonable steps not to cause foreseeable harm to another person or their property. If your actions are reasonably likely to affect someone else, then you owe them a duty of care. This means that you have to take reasonable care to ensure that those people are not harmed or injured as a result of the things you do.

What is balancing individual rights with risks in health and social care?

We have to get the balance between people’s rights, risks and responsibilities correct, but maintain focus on care and support. To achieve this we need to get leaders acting together to do ‘the right things’. Spend time engaging with communities to build trust and develop the concept of risk intelligence. People want choice and control for themselves and safety for those they care for which can cause tension, and impact negatively on human rights. Balance and proportionality are vital considerations in encouraging responsible decision making and in protecting human rights. Duty to Care is actually an umbrella term that encompasses the following areas: Inclusion, Diversity, Mental Health, Well-being and Safeguarding. Duty to Care is actually an umbrella term that encompasses the following areas: Inclusion, Diversity, Mental Health, Well-being and Safeguarding. Examples in Duty of Care Care and services that are safe and of great quality. Dignified and courteous treatment. Your culture, diversity and identity are valued as well as supported. Living a life free of abuse and neglect. Conflicts may arise between the duty of care and an individual’s rights because sometimes they are not aware that their behavior will cause danger or harm to themselves or others.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 + two =

Scroll to Top