Table of Contents
How long does the journal review process take?
Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks. Perhaps the journal has a short review time. You may be able to find this information on the journal website. In any case, there is no direct relation between the time taken by the reviewers to respond and the final decision. Just keep your fingers crossed and wait for the decision. On average, it takes six months from the time you submit your manuscript until you receive a concrete decision (across all academic fields). Even if your article is accepted, it then takes an average of another six months before it is published. On average, it takes six months from the time you submit your manuscript until you receive a concrete decision (across all academic fields). Even if your article is accepted, it then takes an average of another six months before it is published. The timing for this step varies a lot but could be anywhere from 10 days to 6 months or more. If it’s a rejection, you decide what revisions to make and prepare to send it to another journal. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision.
Why does journal review take so long?
Sometimes, this initial evaluation may be delayed due to heavy inflow of manuscript to a journal or non-availability of editors at a particular point of time. Hence, it is always better to write to the journal editor after about 3-4 weeks of submission to know the status of a manuscript. the average time from submission to the first editorial decision (accept, reject, revise) is only 2.3 weeks; it takes on average 2.4 week from acceptance of an article to publication of the final version online. Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. The manuscript is either accepted or rejected. Following peer review, if a manuscript is accepted, it then undergoes proof development and a review process prior to publication. While some can write for hours at a time, researchers say that journaling for at least 15 minutes a day three to five times a week can significantly improve your physical and mental health.
How long does an editorial review take?
Editorial Decisions The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Pending review It usually takes 1–5 days. Delays may be a bit longer if the Managing Editor needs to double-check any information. Please contact the Editorial Office if it has been five business days and an Assistant Editor has not yet been assigned to your submission. Sometimes, this initial evaluation may be delayed due to heavy inflow of manuscript to a journal or non-availability of editors at a particular point of time. Hence, it is always better to write to the journal editor after about 3-4 weeks of submission to know the status of a manuscript. The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete. The timing for this step varies a lot but could be anywhere from 10 days to 6 months or more. If it’s a rejection, you decide what revisions to make and prepare to send it to another journal.
How many hours does it take to review a paper?
Normally, a peer review takes me 1 or 2 days, including reading the supporting information. I almost always do it in one sitting, anything from 1 to 5 hours depending on the length of the paper. In my experience, the submission deadline for reviews usually ranges between 3 working days to up to 3 weeks. Short answer: It takes up to about 3 months (studies have shown peer review typically takes 7–12 weeks), but there are a lot of variables to take into account. These include the journal’s internal processes and publication frequency, availability of peer reviewers, and other things out of your control. A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks. The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete. Sometimes, this initial evaluation may be delayed due to heavy inflow of manuscript to a journal or non-availability of editors at a particular point of time. Hence, it is always better to write to the journal editor after about 3-4 weeks of submission to know the status of a manuscript. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter).
How long should I wait for a journal review?
The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete. Some journals allow more time for an evaluation of a manuscript, some allow less. A 14 day margin is a fairly common parameter for a peer review, but whether you choose 14 days or another amount of time, remember to give a few days of leeway where necessary. Authors can wait from three to four months before sending a gentle reminder to the editor to ask for an update regarding their submission. Most journal editors are authors of other manuscripts so they understand how far you are concerned about the publication of your manuscript. Desk rejects are usually quite quick (e.g., 1 to 4 weeks is common in my experience). Note that not all journals do desk rejects, and many journals vary in how much they filter at this stage.
How long do journal revisions take?
Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks. However, few journals have a mechanism to enforce the deadline, which is why it can be hard to predict how long the peer review process will take. Short answer: It takes up to about 3 months (studies have shown peer review typically takes 7–12 weeks), but there are a lot of variables to take into account. These include the journal’s internal processes and publication frequency, availability of peer reviewers, and other things out of your control. Peer review commonly takes three to six months. If revisions and another round of peer review are required, more time will be added, depending on how long you take to revise your manuscript and how long the second round of peer review takes. How long should I wait for this stage? Answer: Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. Sometimes, this initial evaluation may be delayed due to heavy inflow of manuscript to a journal or non-availability of editors at a particular point of time. Hence, it is always better to write to the journal editor after about 3-4 weeks of submission to know the status of a manuscript. Peer review is the process by which journals scrutinize and regulate the quality of content they publish, by inviting experts in the field to review and comment on manuscripts received. Manuscripts submitted to a journal first go through an initial screening by the editorial team. What is this? 90% of research papers have a word count between 2,023 and 8,284. So it will be a little weird to see a word count outside of this range. Our data also agree that a typical review paper is a little bit longer than a typical original research paper but not by much (3,858 vs 3,708 words).
How long is a review paper usually?
What is this? 90% of research papers have a word count between 2,023 and 8,284. So it will be a little weird to see a word count outside of this range. Our data also agree that a typical review paper is a little bit longer than a typical original research paper but not by much (3,858 vs 3,708 words). Review papers tend to be cited more frequently than regular research articles. This fact, together with the continuous increase of the share of reviews in scientific literature, can have important consequences for the measurement of individuals’ research output, usually based on citation analysis. One to two pages is typically the norm; however, I have submitted a few three- to four-page reviews when I thought an article was already quite good, but could be better.
How long does it take for decision in process after under review?
Answer: Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. When a manuscript is submitted to a journal, it is assessed to see if it meets the criteria for submission. If it does, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers within the field of research to peer-review the manuscript and make recommendations. Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. The manuscript is either accepted or rejected. Following peer review, if a manuscript is accepted, it then undergoes proof development and a review process prior to publication. If the status of your paper has changed to decision in process without first changing to under review, it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. It does not necessarily imply rejection, so you need not lose hope just yet.