Table of Contents
Is prolonged exposure therapy ethical?
If practitioners believe the delivery of exposure is harmful then ethical considerations are warranted, as practitioners must first “take care and do no harm” and “safeguard the welfare and rights” of their patients. (APA, 2010). According to the available evidence, exposure is not inherently harmful. There are three techniques one might experience in exposure therapy: in vivo, imaginal and flooding. Systematic desensitisation is much more ethical than flooding, because the participants are only exposed gradually to the thing that they fear and they only move on to greater exposure when they feel ready. With flooding, the patient is exposed to the object they fear all at once, in a very intense way. The disadvantage of systematic desensitization is that it is slow, and that it is often necessary to eventually implement some form of real-life exposure in order to fully reduce the fears. Exposure therapy is effective for the treatment of anxiety disorders. According to EBBP.org, about 60 to 90 percent of people have either no symptoms or mild symptoms of their original disorder after completing their exposure therapy.
Is exposure therapy controversial?
Although sometimes controversial, exposure therapy is still considered one of the most effective psychological techniques for the treatment of phobias and anxiety. A fear-inducing situation activates a small group of neurons in the amygdala. Exposure therapy silences these fear neurons, causing them to be less active. As a result of this reduced activity, fear responses are alleviated. CBT is an umbrella term that refers to a large category of both cognitive and behavioral therapies. Exposure Therapy is behavioral therapy and therefore falls under the larger term of Behavioral Therapy. Exposure with Response Prevention is a specific type of Exposure Therapy that was designed to treat OCD. In this form of therapy, psychologists create a safe environment in which to “expose” individuals to the things they fear and avoid. The exposure to the feared objects, activities or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance. A therapist may stimulate their fears through imagination or create a scenario in real life for the person to face. Systematic desensitization is a similar approach, but it uses muscle relaxation alongside exposure to reduce physical responses of anxiety.
What are the criticisms of exposure therapy?
Limitations of Exposure Therapy Some professionals believe that exposure therapy may make symptoms worse, especially when dealing with PTSD. Additionally, exposure therapy is difficult work that causes people to feel and confront things that they have worked hard to avoid. Ethical concerns regarding exposure treatment for anxiety include fears of symptom exacerbation, high treatment dropout rates, client safety concerns, and the blurring of boundary lines between therapists and clients. Exposure therapy, or the process of repeatedly exposing a client to a feared stimulus in the absence of a feared outcome, is based on the Pavlovian extinction principle that if a CS is repeatedly presented in the absence of the US, the CR will gradually stop. If practitioners believe the delivery of exposure is harmful then ethical considerations are warranted, as practitioners must first “take care and do no harm” and “safeguard the welfare and rights” of their patients. (APA, 2010). According to the available evidence, exposure is not inherently harmful. In this form of therapy, psychologists create a safe environment in which to “expose” individuals to the things they fear and avoid. The exposure to the feared objects, activities or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance.
Can exposure therapy backfire?
In fact, it could backfire and make the patient even more frightened of that thing. This is particularly true of exposure therapy, which can backfire badly, but even the tape recordings or constant flow of images involved in flooding can be too much for some patients. Systematic desensitisation is much more ethical than flooding, because the participants are only exposed gradually to the thing that they fear and they only move on to greater exposure when they feel ready. With flooding, the patient is exposed to the object they fear all at once, in a very intense way. The problem with prolonged exposure is that it also has made a number of veterans violent, suicidal, and depressed, and it has a dropout rate that some researchers put at more than 50 percent, the highest dropout rate of any PTSD therapy that has been widely studied so far. Although sometimes controversial, exposure therapy is still considered one of the most effective psychological techniques for the treatment of phobias and anxiety. What is the goal of exposure therapy? The goal of exposure therapy is to help people confront and overcome their fears by gradually exposing them to the things that make them anxious or afraid. For every 4 cm increase in patient thickness requires a doubling of exposure (time) in order to achieve an image of equal density. type of: desensitisation procedure, desensitisation technique, desensitization procedure, desensitization technique, systematic desensitisation, systematic desensitization.
What is another name for exposure therapy?
type of: desensitisation procedure, desensitisation technique, desensitization procedure, desensitization technique, systematic desensitisation, systematic desensitization. Systematic desensitisation uses reverse counter-conditioning to unlearn the maladaptive response to a situation or object, by eliciting another response (relaxation). There are three critical components to systematic desensitisation: 1) Fear hierarchy; 2) Relaxation training; 3) Reciprocal inhibition. There are three steps in systematic desensitization therapy: learning and practicing relaxation techniques such as deep breathing, meditation, or progressive muscle relaxation.