Is 5 a good impact factor for a journal?

Is 5 a good impact factor for a journal?

In general, the impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. Just as an example, the very prestigious journal Nature had an impact factor of 69.504 in 2021. In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1. In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1. Impact scores run from 10 to 90, where 10 is best. Generally speaking, impact/priority scores of 10 to 30 are most likely to be funded; scores between 31 and 45 might be funded; scores greater than 46 are rarely funded. The majority of journals, in fact, fall in the bracket of an IF of 1-1+. So, a journal with an IF of 2-2.5 would be considered having a higher impact than these journals. A journal with an IF of 5 or above would be considered high-impact, but note that these would be fewer in number. You can either refer to the Scopus® database to find the impact score of the journal. The data from the Scopus® database can also be found at resurchify.com. You can find the impact score of thousands of journals on this website.

Does journal impact factor matter?

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Good impact factors In general, the impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. Just as an example, the very prestigious journal Nature had an impact factor of 69.504 in 2021. The h index is used to evaluate a researcher’s or an author’s scientific productivity based on the number of published research papers and their citations. In contrast, the impact factor evaluates the total number of articles cited within the Journal during the previous two years. An impact factor of 10 can be considered excellent – although unreachable in many categories – as in 2020 only 3.65% of the journals had an impact factor of 10 or higher. An impact factor of 10 isn’t even the highest score though. The majority of journals, in fact, fall in the bracket of an IF of 1-1+. So, a journal with an IF of 2-2.5 would be considered having a higher impact than these journals. A journal with an IF of 5 or above would be considered high-impact, but note that these would be fewer in number. A percentage or total number figure of a researcher’s publications which are published in top journal percentiles (top 1% and 10%). The top journal percentiles can be based on 3 different journal metrics provided by Elsevier – CiteScore, SNIP or SJR.

Is 2 a good journal impact factor?

So, a journal with an IF of 2-2.5 would be considered having a higher impact than these journals. A journal with an IF of 5 or above would be considered high-impact, but note that these would be fewer in number. Most journals actually fall in the combined category of an IF of 1-2. Reasons why a journal might not have an Impact Factor include: It may cover an Arts & Humanities subject, which isn’t listed in either the Social Sciences Citation Index or the Sciences Citation Index (the databases which Impact Factors are based on). A journal was assigned to be in D1 (first decile) if it ranked within the first 10% of journals within its subject area. In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1. This is a rule of thumb. In general, the impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. Q1 is occupied by the top 25% of journals in the list; Q2 is occupied by journals in the 25 to 50% group; Q3 is occupied by journals in the 50 to 75% group and Q4 is occupied by journals in the 75 to 100% group.

Is 6 a good impact factor for a journal?

The top 5% of journals have impact factors approximately equal to or greater than 6 (610 journals or 4.9% of the journals tracked by JCR). The overall rank of BMC Public Health is 3237. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 1.156. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. The overall rank of BMC Psychiatry is 2836. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 1.252. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals. Q1 is occupied by the top 25% of journals in the list; Q2 is occupied by journals in the 25 to 50% group; Q3 is occupied by journals in the 50 to 75% group and Q4 is occupied by journals in the 75 to 100% group. The most prestigious journals within a subject area are those occupying the first quartile, Q1. Even a Few Citations Can Still Mean Being Highly-Cited Three citations would put it in the top 10% most cited articles. Obviously, for articles published in earlier years the number of citations to be in the top 20% or 10% may be higher.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

thirteen + 9 =

Scroll to Top