Table of Contents
Is person-centered therapy the same as CBT?
Both therapies work to help support the person address issues that are individual to them. The main difference is that in Person Centred Therapy the client is the expert on himself, and in CBT the therapist is the experts and provides a directive approach. Client centered therapy, or person centered therapy, is a non-directive approach to talk therapy. It requires the client to actively take the reins during each therapy session, while the therapist acts mainly as a guide or a source of support for the client. One of the most important aspects of the person-centered therapy technique is that the therapist must exhibit unconditional positive regard for the client. In short, this means that they accept and care for the client as they are. Client-centered or person-centered therapy is most effective for individuals who are experiencing symptoms of situational stressors, depression, and anxiety or who are working through issues related to personality disorders [1]. Capuzzi & Gross (1999) summarized 4 basic assumptions of Person-centered therapy as: (1.) humans are basically ‘trustworthy,’ (2.) humans have tendency to pursue ‘self-actualization and health,’ (3.) humans own ‘inner resources’ for ‘positive directions’ and (4.)
What is another name for person-centered therapy?
Person-centered therapy, also known as Rogerian therapy or client-based therapy, employs a non-authoritative approach that allows clients to take more of a lead in sessions such that, in the process, they discover their own solutions. The core purpose of person-centred therapy is to facilitate our ability to self-actualise – the belief that all of us will grow and fulfil our potential. This approach facilitates the personal growth and relationships of a client by allowing them to explore and utilise their own strengths and personal identity. We argue that CBT, while using different interventions than those traditionally used by person-centred therapists, can be practiced as a highly empathic, person-centred form of therapy. The term counselling is of American origin, coined by Carl Rogers, who, lacking a medical qualification was prevented from calling his work psychotherapy. In the U.S., counselling psychology, like many modern psychology specialties, started as a result of World War II. According to Rogers (1977), three characteristics, or attributes, of thetherapist form the core part of the therapeutic relationship – congruence,unconditional positive regard (UPR) and accurate empathic understanding.
Is person-centered therapy used today?
Person-centered therapy has been used successfully for a variety of common mental health issues, including depression and anxiety. One paper suggests the technique of unconditional positive regard, in particular, was found to have a positive effect in a case study of a patient with social anxiety. There are criticisms of person centered therapy which relate to the theoretical model, the client experience, and the range of problems for which it is effective. It has been argued that it is not possible to completely avoid therapist bias or direction in sessions. Carl R. Rogers (1902–1987) is esteemed as one of the founders of humanistic psychology. He developed the person-centered, also known as client-centered, approach to psychotherapy and developed the concept of unconditional positive regard while pioneering the field of clinical psychological research. Results suggested that these person-centred therapists ask questions regularly for many reasons including; to check their understanding or to clarify an issue for the client; to challenge the client; to enable the client’s processing; and sometimes just out of curiosity. Both therapies work to help support the person address issues that are individual to them. The main difference is that in Person Centred Therapy the client is the expert on himself, and in CBT the therapist is the experts and provides a directive approach. In contrast to the psychodynamic approach, the person-centred approach focuses on the conscious mind and what is going on in the here-and-now whereas the psychodynamic approach focuses on the subconscious and looks to early childhood to examine unresolved conflicts.